Marketplace Product Design

Creating confidence in uncertain decisions.

I designed a marketplace experience that helped people discover, evaluate, and connect with trusted service providers.

The work focused on the moments that build confidence—from comparing experience and credentials to knowing what would happen after making contact.

Confidence mapRatings, experience, credentials, social proof, profile image, and clear next steps connect to confidence.CONFIDENCERATINGSEXPERIENCECREDENTIALSSOCIAL PROOFPROFILE IMAGECLEARNEXT STEPS
My role
Product Designer
Researcher
Team
Two developers, a product manager, and a project manager
Scope
User research
Product strategy
UX/UI design
User testing
Industry
Financial services
Company
WealthGuide — name changed under NDA

Note — the client’s name is under NDA. Throughout this case study the company is referred to as WealthGuide, and all screens are shown with client branding removed.

The Context

Choosing a provider is a high-trust decision.

WealthGuide connects people with local providers for financial and life decisions. At the time, customers submitted a request form and received one to three provider recommendations.

This project explored a new model that allowed customers to compare providers directly and choose based on their own preferences.

  • Limited provider visibility
  • Unclear expectations after submitting a request
  • Inconsistent provider experiences
  • Low return engagement across services
  • A growing need for customer trust and loyalty

The Challenge

More control made trust even more important.

The proposed marketplace gave customers more control, but it also made trust more important. People needed to compare providers, understand their credibility, and feel confident choosing a professional.

The experience also needed to support the full journey, from discovery and evaluation to account creation and follow-up. Customers needed to feel confident at every step.

Original business frame

What the business set out to do


  • Create a new monetized model
  • Drive customer engagement
  • Increase interactions between providers and customers

Deeper user problem

What customers actually needed


  • Hiring a provider is a high-trust decision
  • Customers need confidence before taking action
  • Provider information, ratings, and vetting signals need to be clear and reliable

Product Vision

From one-time matching to an ongoing relationship.

The long-term vision was to turn WealthGuide from a one-time provider-matching experience into an ongoing relationship platform.

Customers could compare providers, choose trusted professionals, access relevant resources, and return as new financial or life needs emerged across real estate, tax, insurance, and other services.

Product future vision
Product vision flow connecting marketplace discovery, profile data, communication, and service purchase

Understanding Trust

What helped people feel confident enough to choose?

My team and I explored the information people needed to trust and select a provider. We tested several concepts and features with potential customers to understand what shaped their decisions.

Key Observation


Features focused on trust consistently performed better than features focused on convenience.

Key insights — what people wanted

  • Highly rated professionals
  • Relevant experience
  • Social proof and recommendations
  • Confidence before making contact

Testing Trust Signals

How should new providers appear before they have ratings?

One key question emerged during research: how should new providers be presented when they had not yet received ratings? We conducted additional testing to understand how people evaluated providers without reviews.

Customers were willing to consider unrated professionals when other trust signals were available—experience, credentials, specializations, and professional background. This finding shaped how providers were presented in the marketplace.

Star rating display test

Mobile Test Screen
Mobile search results screen used to test an unrated provider among rated providers

Four Treatments Tested

Provider card with a Newly Joined badge in place of a rating
01. “Newly Joined!” badge
Provider card showing Not rated yet in place of a star rating
02. “Not rated (yet)”
Provider card showing Not rated yet with a View Experience button
03. Highlight “View Experience”
Provider card showing an empty grey star row
04. Empty star row

Test result

We asked if users would consider a provider without a star rating

Donut chart: yes 33 percent, no 57 percent, and not sure 10 percent

Reasons for consideration:

  • Years of experience
  • Precise detailed experience description
  • Their ranking within their regions
  • Records of home selling/buying
  • Professional profile pictures with a pleasant look

Star rating finding

  1. 01

    Years of experience is one of the top determining factors for users to consider any agents besides ratings and reviews.

  2. 02

    Agents with strong experience but no ratings or reviews raised skepticism. Users questioned why their experience wasn’t backed by customer feedback.

  3. 03

    Review volume also mattered. Most preferred a 4.5-star agent with 24 reviews over a 5-star agent with only 5, suggesting that more reviews increased trust and credibility.

Design response


We used the label “Not rated yet” for providers without reviews to avoid drawing unnecessary attention to the absence of ratings.

We also turned the research findings into profile guidelines, helping providers—especially those without ratings—to strengthen their bios and highlight relevant experience to improve their chances of being considered.

Designing the Experience

Giving customers more control without adding uncertainty.

The marketplace gave customers more control over the selection process and allow them to explore their options and choose providers who fit their needs.

The experience focused on four areas

01

Discovering providers

02

Comparing options

03

Building confidence

04

Taking action

User flow from provider search and filtering through profile details, account creation, confirmation, and requests
Discovery
Service selection screen for choosing the service needed
Search results
Search results listing providers with ratings and experience
Provider profile
Provider profile with verified credentials and a request call action
My providers
My Providers screen showing selected providers by service

Validating the experience

We created an interactive prototype and observed how people moved from provider discovery to selection. The prototype helped validate key assumptions about trust, provider evaluation, and account creation.

Outcome

What changed.

The project showed that customers were interested in the marketplace and could complete the full journey.

Although the marketplace was not continued, part of the work was later used in the My Providers section—a place for customers and providers to connect.

  1. 01Learned which details helped customers trust providers
  2. 02Confirmed that customers wanted to compare and choose providers themselves
  3. 03Found that missing reviews made providers harder to judge
  4. 04Improved provider bios and experience details
  5. 05Shaped later work on customer and provider experiences

Insight

Confidence had to come before action. Trust depended on several signals working together—ratings, reviews, experience, specialties, and clear next steps.

Cross-team dependencies delayed provider reviews, showing how much the customer experience relied on the systems and operations behind it.

The concept showed customer value, but moving it forward also required stronger business readiness and stakeholder alignment.

Start a Conversation

You don’t need to have it all figured out before we talk.

Tell me how I can help

Tell me what you’re working on, what feels unclear, and where you hope to go. We can begin by making sense of it together.